Intentionally delayed to make Vista look bad?
So iTunes breaks in Windows Vista, that is, if you have purchased iTunes music... Apple announces a patch soon after the Vista release, and says there will be a new version if iTunes in a "few weeks"...
Who do I blame here? MS? No.... they might have broken compatibility, yes. However, Apple has been able to get its hands on Vista for over a year, as has anybody in the public. The FINAL version of Vista has been available for several months - legally to anyone subscribed to the MS Dev Network (which hopefully someone working on the Windows version of iTunes is)...
This, then, is clearly Apple's fault, not Microsoft's. Why? Well, since they've had access to Vista for so long - why would they wait until AFTER the Vista release to provide a patch? Easy. It makes Windows look bad. They've got this base of customers who are already leaning toward Apple - since they've got iTunes Music and an iPod.... what would it take to tip them over to Apple's side? Why, being shown how unreliable Vista is! Fact is, Apple could have fixed this compatibility issue with plenty of time to spare before Vista came out, and pushed it out with regular updates. They CHOSE not to do so, instead waiting until Vista was released, and peoples music libraries were suddenly unplayable (who had upgraded to Vista), and then go back and say OOOH look what VISTA DID!!! We better release A FIX!!!
From my view, they are literally punishing Apple customers (iTunes/iPod) who dared buy Vista so early. What do you think?